← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Sondreal Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 27 11 21 32 1.185 0.3191 0.3191 0.2879 0.2879
2020-21 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 20 16 22 38 1.900 0.5115 0.5115 0.4615 0.4615
2021-22 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 19 12 10 22 1.158 0.3117 0.3117 0.2813 0.2813
2022-23 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 59 13 25 38 0.644 0.4102 0.4062 1.9302 1.9114
2023-24 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 60 27 42 69 1.150 0.7323 0.6888 3.4462 3.2415
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston College D1 HockeyEast 36 7 14 21 0.583
2024-25 Boston College D1 HockeyEast 36 2 4 6 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.54
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2024-25 · Boston College
-68.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2183
Forward overall
#79
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.57 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.60 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.