IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Russell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 55 16 20 36 0.654 0.2195 0.2275 0.6057 0.6277
2022-23 Fargo Force USHL 60 14 20 34 0.567 0.3343 0.3227 1.7020 1.6430
2023-24 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 37 12 10 22 0.595 0.3508 0.3212 1.7858 1.6353
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 35 6 9 15 0.429
2024-25 Maine D1 HockeyEast — 35 7 19 26 0.743
2023-24 Clarkson D1 ECAC — 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

75%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13876
Forward overall
#666
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Micale
Buffalo State · 2023-24
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Wahlin
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2012-13
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cannon Bonifay
Westfield State · 2024-25
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.