← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Russell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 55 16 20 36 0.654 0.2172 0.2251 0.6066 0.6286
2022-23 Fargo Force USHL 60 14 20 34 0.567 0.3484 0.3363 1.6696 1.6117
2023-24 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 37 12 10 22 0.595 0.3655 0.3347 1.7518 1.6041
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 35 6 9 15 0.429
2024-25 Maine D1 HockeyEast 35 7 19 26 0.743
2023-24 Clarkson D1 ECAC 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13386
Forward overall
#644
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.161 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.