← New Search ↗ Social Card

Myles Hilman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 47 11 17 28 0.596 0.1998 0.1998 0.5521 0.5521
2020-21 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 10 2 5 7 0.700 0.2348 0.2348 0.6488 0.6488
2021-22 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 47 24 23 47 1.000 0.3354 0.3501 0.9268 0.9675
2022-23 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 52 17 8 25 0.481 0.2836 0.2759 1.4165 1.3781
2023-24 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 52 26 11 37 0.712 0.4197 0.3875 2.0962 1.9352
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 36 6 3 9 0.250
2024-25 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 25 6 6 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2024-25 · Nebraska Omaha
+63.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

82%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10511
Forward overall
#462
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.