IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack MacLellan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-06-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Calgary Canucks AJHL 58 13 31 44 0.759 0.2517 0.2591 0.7031 0.7237
2007-08 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 62 29 49 78 1.258 0.4174 0.4066 1.1660 1.1359
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Brown D1 ECAC SR 30 15 15 30 1.000
2010-11 Brown D1 ECAC JR 25 14 17 31 1.240
2009-10 Brown D1 ECAC SO 36 15 19 34 0.944
2008-09 Brown D1 ECAC FR 30 2 4 6 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2008-09 · Brown
-32.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11712
Forward overall
#456
Forward born in 1988
#184
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Heinonen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jared Linnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Biggs
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Master
Stevenson · 2017-18
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean David
Canton · 2016-17
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gavin Bloder
Fredonia · 2022-23
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.