IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Brandt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Tabor NE-Prep 28 4 12 16 0.571 0.1612 0.1612 0.2615 0.2615
2020-21 South Shore Kings NCDC 7 1 1 2 0.286 0.1593 0.1593 0.2310 0.2310
2021-22 Tabor NE-Prep 24 11 25 36 1.500 0.4232 0.4232 0.6864 0.6864
2022-23 — USHL 50 11 12 23 0.460 0.2828 0.2845 1.3553 1.3636
2023-24 Madison Capitols USHL 56 12 19 31 0.554 0.3403 0.3255 1.6310 1.5601
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 34 8 10 18 0.529
2024-25 Colgate D1 ECAC — 31 2 5 7 0.226
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2024-25 · Colgate
-14.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12308
Forward overall
#545
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Geordan Buffoline
New England · 2018-19
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Gravelle
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Hudson
Manhattanville · 2007-08
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.