IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Theo Wallberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-12-04 Country: Sweden
2022 NHL Draft Round 6, Pick #168  ·  Ottawa Senators Ottawa Senators
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 — SuperElit 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 — SuperElit 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 — SuperElit 46 2 21 23 0.500 0.1959 0.2003 0.6141 0.6280
2022-23 — USHL 60 5 17 22 0.367 0.2254 0.2208 1.0804 1.0585
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 37 2 12 14 0.378
2024-25 Ohio State D1 BigTen — 27 0 8 8 0.296
2023-24 Ohio State D1 BigTen — 38 2 19 21 0.553
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2023-24 · Ohio State
+175.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4921
Defenseman overall
#1251
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Dakota Mermis
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nelson Armstrong
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Walker Harris
Wesleyan · 2015-16
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Braccini
Bethel · 2019-20
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Covelli
Colby · 2003-04
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.