← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Bienvenue Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-05-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 22 2 2 4 0.182 0.0610 0.0593 0.1682 0.1634
2008-09 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 19 3 2 5 0.263 0.0883 0.0821 0.2436 0.2265
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Neumann D3 MAC 12 1 1 2 0.167
2011-12 Neumann D3 MAC GR 9 1 8 9 1.000
2010-11 Neumann D3 MAC SR 15 0 3 3 0.200
2009-10 Neumann D3 MAC JR 18 5 6 11 0.611
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2009-10 · Neumann
+877.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#52110
Forward overall
#1743
Forward born in 1988
#2289
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2007-08
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.