IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Crisp Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-05-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Elite 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.0461 0.0498 0.1145 0.1238
2018-19 North Carolina Golden Bears EHL 45 1 10 11 0.244 0.0565 0.0621 0.1196 0.1315
2019-20 Northeast Generals NA3HL 10 0 2 2 0.200 0.0251 0.0251 0.0631 0.0631
2020-21 Northeast Generals NA3HL 22 1 13 14 0.636 0.0799 0.0799 0.2009 0.2009
2021-22 Northeast Generals NA3HL 21 0 12 12 0.571 0.0717 0.0665 0.1804 0.1673
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Arcadia D3 MAC — 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14673
Defenseman overall
#2477
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Brunton
Salve Regina · 2021-22
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Brumwell
Marian · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole McCaig
Marian · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.