← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jon Brumwell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 11 4 2 6 0.545 0.2102 0.2147 0.7939 0.8110
2013-14 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 45 15 8 23 0.511 0.1309 0.1291 0.3853 0.3799
2014-15 SJHL 53 10 12 22 0.415 0.1063 0.0992 0.3129 0.2921
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Marian D1 NCHA SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Marian D3 NCHA 4 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC GR 23 2 1 3 0.130
2017-18 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA GR 23 2 1 3 0.130
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 15 3 3 6 0.400
2016-17 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SR 15 3 3 6 0.400
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 21 2 1 3 0.143
2015-16 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA JR 21 2 1 3 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2015-16 · Concordia
+50.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36241
Forward overall
#1428
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Morrisville · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.278 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.