← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Homitz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHLP 41 20 26 46 1.122 0.1287 0.1295 0.2529 0.2545
2016-17 EHL 35 12 9 21 0.600 0.1386 0.1394 0.2936 0.2952
2017-18 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs USPHL-Premier 38 23 17 40 1.053 0.1377 0.1284 0.3573 0.3332
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 26 9 10 19 0.731
2019-20 Cortland D1 SO 23 13 9 22 0.957
2019-20 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 23 13 9 22 0.957
2018-19 Cortland D1 FR 18 1 4 5 0.278
2018-19 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 18 1 4 5 0.278
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2018-19 · Cortland
+144.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18822
Forward overall
#838
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2021-22
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.