IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Shorrock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.3354 0.3585 0.9254 0.9891
2016-17 — SJHL 31 1 2 3 0.097 0.0248 0.0256 0.0730 0.0754
2017-18 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 56 8 13 21 0.375 0.0961 0.0948 0.2827 0.2789
2018-19 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 55 11 17 28 0.509 0.1304 0.1219 0.3838 0.3589
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bryn Athyn D1 — FR 21 6 6 12 0.571
2019-20 Bryn Athyn D3 — FR 21 6 6 12 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2019-20 · Bryn Athyn
+500.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#44007
Forward overall
#2335
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Max Novick
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Cafarelli
Utica · 2023-24
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Sheehy
University of New England · 2018-19
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.