← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Brunton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Calgary Canucks AJHL 56 13 9 22 0.393 0.1318 0.1318 0.3641 0.3641
2020-21 Calgary Canucks AJHL 14 3 3 6 0.429 0.1438 0.1438 0.3972 0.3972
2021-22 Calgary Canucks AJHL 49 10 11 21 0.429 0.1438 0.1324 0.3972 0.3658
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 25 11 14 25 1.000
2024-25 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 26 14 6 20 0.769
2023-24 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 28 6 7 13 0.464
2022-23 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 23 2 7 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2022-23 · Salve Regina
+245.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38600
Forward overall
#2127
Forward born in 2001
#1434
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2011-12
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2012-13
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.