IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole McCaig Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 5 0 2 2 0.400 0.0770 0.0870 0.2522 0.2851
2011-12 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 56 2 7 9 0.161 0.0412 0.0425 0.1211 0.1250
2012-13 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 46 8 9 17 0.370 0.0947 0.0936 0.2786 0.2752
2013-14 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 36 4 11 15 0.417 0.0802 0.0747 0.2628 0.2447
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Marian D3 NCHA SR 28 2 7 9 0.321
2016-17 Marian D3 NCHA JR 27 2 8 10 0.370
2015-16 Marian D3 NCHA SO 22 1 3 4 0.182
2014-15 Marian D3 NCHA FR 19 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#49469
Forward overall
#1863
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Blake O'Neill
Elmira · 2014-15
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Ramm
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2023-24
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Pickering
Canton · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.