IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derek Rodwell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-07-08 Country: Canada
2009 · Round 5, Pick #144  ·  New Jersey Devils New Jersey Devils
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 62 9 10 19 0.306 0.1028 0.1109 0.2836 0.3059
2008-09 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 41 17 12 29 0.707 0.2372 0.2460 0.6545 0.6787
2009-10 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 55 18 35 53 0.964 0.3232 0.3186 0.8917 0.8791
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 North Dakota D1 NCHC SR 33 5 5 10 0.303
2012-13 North Dakota D1 WCHA-orig JR 32 2 1 3 0.094
2011-12 North Dakota D1 WCHA-orig SO 19 1 1 2 0.105
2010-11 North Dakota D1 WCHA-orig FR 39 5 4 9 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2010-11 · North Dakota
-6.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22407
Forward overall
#856
Forward born in 1990
#565
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Garret Clemment
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
John Simonson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jay Dickman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jonathan Andrews
Southern New Hampshire · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Noel Lortie
Elmira · 2004-05
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Laganiere
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.