IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bodie Nobes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-07-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 53 9 24 33 0.623 0.1988 0.2048 0.4820 0.4965
2022-23 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 62 10 5 15 0.242 0.1487 0.1429 0.7127 0.6847
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 15 0 1 1 0.067
2024-25 Maine D1 HockeyEast — 21 1 4 5 0.238
2023-24 Maine D1 HockeyEast — 19 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8868
Defenseman overall
#2020
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jaden Davis
Aurora · 2023-24
1.031 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
George Vonakis
Curry · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Hull
Marian · 2005-06
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.