IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Collins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 25 2 6 8 0.320 0.0617 0.0617 0.1464 0.1464
2019-20 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 28 2 5 7 0.250 0.0482 0.0482 0.1144 0.1144
2021-22 South Shore Kings NCDC 25 4 5 9 0.360 0.0832 0.0837 0.2911 0.2930
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 — 32 10 24 34 1.062
2024-25 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 — 10 3 2 5 0.500
2022-23 Stonehill D2 NE10 — 23 3 10 13 0.565
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2022-23 · Stonehill
+849.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
35%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19428
Forward overall
#1049
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Zhukov
Curry · 2018-19
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Headland
Canton · 2017-18
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Keenan McNeill
Fredonia · 2023-24
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.