IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark Zhukov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-29 Country: Russia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Boston Jr. Bandits NCDC 46 11 8 19 0.413 0.0954 0.1010 0.3340 0.3535
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bandits NCDC 46 5 19 24 0.522 0.1206 0.1208 0.4218 0.4224
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Curry D3 CNE SR 22 13 24 37 1.682
2021-22 Curry D3 CNE JR 22 8 13 21 0.955
2020-21 Curry D1 — SO 5 2 2 4 0.800
2020-21 Curry D3 CNE SO 5 2 2 4 0.800
2019-20 Curry D1 — FR 25 3 11 14 0.560
2019-20 Curry D3 CNE FR 25 3 11 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2019-20 · Curry
+479.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19219
Forward overall
#940
Forward born in 1999
#581
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colby Nichol
Augsburg · 2003-04
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Polsinelli
Trinity · 2015-16
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Thieda
Norwich · 2009-10
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.