IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Dion Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-05-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 50 6 13 19 0.380 0.1275 0.1313 0.3517 0.3621
2009-10 — AJHL 45 9 12 21 0.467 0.1565 0.1531 0.4319 0.4226
2010-11 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 55 8 13 21 0.382 0.1281 0.1186 0.3533 0.3271
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SR 28 10 7 17 0.607
2013-14 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen JR 25 1 4 5 0.200
2012-13 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 26 4 10 14 0.538
2011-12 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 24 1 3 4 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2011-12 · Wisconsin-Superior
+47.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39628
Forward overall
#1430
Forward born in 1990
#1487
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wyatt Fischer
Misericordia · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Miller
Wisconsin-Superior · 2001-02
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Anderson
Augsburg · 2013-14
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.