IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joel Paiement Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-08-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 48 5 7 12 0.250 0.0838 0.0873 0.2314 0.2409
2010-11 — AJHL 54 6 11 17 0.315 0.1056 0.1044 0.2913 0.2880
2011-12 Calgary Canucks AJHL 57 9 15 24 0.421 0.1412 0.1324 0.3897 0.3655
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 28 3 9 12 0.429
2014-15 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 26 4 1 5 0.192
2013-14 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 26 2 7 9 0.346
2012-13 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 6 1 1 2 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2012-13 · St. Scholastica
+221.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#43657
Forward overall
#1560
Forward born in 1991
#1731
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dennis Kubat
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Crowley
SUNY Brockport · 2004-05
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Sifferlen
UMass Boston · 2015-16
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.