← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brayden Morrison Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 53 14 16 30 0.566 0.1878 0.1878 0.5246 0.5246
2020-21 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 8 3 4 7 0.875 0.2903 0.2903 0.8109 0.8109
2022-23 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 36 7 4 11 0.306 0.1879 0.1692 0.9004 0.8108
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Miami D1 NCHC GR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Miami D1 NCHC SR 23 0 2 2 0.087
2023-24 Miami D1 NCHC JR 26 0 1 1 0.038
2022-23 Wisconsin D1 BigTen 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Wisconsin D1 BigTen 18 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30104
Forward overall
#1764
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2018-19
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2021-22
0.931 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.