IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Bradshaw Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-12-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Brooks Bandits AJHL 40 3 6 9 0.225 0.0755 0.0798 0.2082 0.2199
2010-11 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 52 5 9 14 0.269 0.0690 0.0702 0.2029 0.2064
2011-12 — SJHL 39 11 15 26 0.667 0.1708 0.1645 0.5026 0.4839
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 5 1 1 2 0.400
2014-15 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 5 0 1 1 0.200
2013-14 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 11 1 3 4 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2012-13 · St. Norbert
+235.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39588
Forward overall
#1385
Forward born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stefan Seel
Concordia · 2014-15
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Maisells
New England College · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Musselwhite
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.