IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Bradshaw Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-12-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Brooks Bandits AJHL 40 3 6 9 0.225 0.0752 0.0794 0.2089 0.2207
2010-11 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 52 5 9 14 0.269 0.0778 0.0791 0.2027 0.2062
2011-12 — SJHL 39 11 15 26 0.667 0.1926 0.1854 0.5019 0.4832
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 5 1 1 2 0.400
2014-15 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 5 0 1 1 0.200
2013-14 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 11 1 3 4 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2012-13 · St. Norbert
+197.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31560
Forward overall
#1221
Forward born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stefan Seel
Concordia · 2014-15
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Musselwhite
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean McKenzie
Suffolk · 2009-10
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.