← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Hage Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-04-14 Country: Canada
2024 NHL Draft Round 1, Pick #21  ·  Montreal Canadiens Montreal Canadiens
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 OJHL 1 2 2 4 4.000 1.2016 1.4000 2.7380 3.1902
2022-23 USHL 13 5 5 10 0.769 0.4728 0.5190 2.2662 2.4877
2023-24 Chicago Steel USHL 54 33 42 75 1.389 0.8538 0.8948 4.0920 4.2886
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Michigan D1 BigTen SO 39 13 39 52 1.333
2024-25 Michigan D1 BigTen 33 13 21 34 1.030
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.69
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.03
2024-25 · Michigan
+48.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
82%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2998
Forward overall
#26
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
1.02 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.22 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.94 D1 FR PPG)
0.80 Elite
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.74 D1 FR PPG)
0.80 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.84 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.