IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam House Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-06-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Calgary Canucks AJHL 39 1 6 7 0.179 0.0602 0.0651 0.1661 0.1796
2011-12 — AJHL 48 3 12 15 0.312 0.1048 0.1080 0.2891 0.2980
2012-13 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 31 3 3 6 0.194 0.0649 0.0636 0.1790 0.1753
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Neumann D3 MAC SR 27 1 11 12 0.444
2015-16 Neumann D3 MAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Neumann D3 MAC SO 12 0 3 3 0.250
2013-14 Neumann D3 MAC FR 20 3 9 12 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2013-14 · Neumann
+681.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21500
Defenseman overall
#2004
Defenseman born in 1993
#2308
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Hoy
Adrian · 2011-12
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Bournazos
Neumann · 2009-10
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Czarnecki
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.