← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandt Weldon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-11-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 28 4 3 7 0.250 0.0761 0.0811 0.1853 0.1975
2011-12 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 55 15 16 31 0.564 0.1717 0.1737 0.4177 0.4226
2012-13 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 35 3 10 13 0.371 0.1131 0.1094 0.2752 0.2662
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 23 2 9 11 0.478
2016-17 Concordia (WI) D3 SR 23 2 9 11 0.478
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 22 1 4 5 0.227
2015-16 Concordia (WI) D3 JR 22 1 4 5 0.227
2014-15 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 20 4 5 9 0.450
2014-15 Concordia (WI) D3 SO 20 4 5 9 0.450
2013-14 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 23 3 8 11 0.478
2013-14 Concordia (WI) D3 FR 23 3 8 11 0.478
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2013-14 · Concordia
+274.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12552
Defenseman overall
#1500
Defenseman born in 1992
#1267
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2012-13
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.