← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nic Chin-Degraves Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Brooks Bandits AJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0671 0.0671 0.1851 0.1851
2020-21 Brooks Bandits AJHL 14 3 6 9 0.643 0.2156 0.2156 0.5949 0.5949
2021-22 Brooks Bandits AJHL 53 14 33 47 0.887 0.2974 0.3044 0.8206 0.8399
2022-23 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 13 1 7 8 0.615 0.3630 0.3458 1.8483 1.7605
2023-24 Brooks Bandits AJHL 40 13 37 50 1.250 0.4192 0.3885 1.1567 1.0720
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Penn State D1 BigTen SO 37 3 6 9 0.243
2024-25 Penn State D1 BigTen 33 4 5 9 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2024-25 · Penn State
-14.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11958
Forward overall
#548
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2017-18
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.967 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.