← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steenn Pasichnuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 58 8 17 25 0.431 0.1446 0.1470 0.3988 0.4054
2014-15 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 55 8 23 31 0.564 0.1890 0.1821 0.5214 0.5023
2015-16 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 49 19 30 49 1.000 0.3354 0.3075 0.9252 0.8483
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Arizona State D1 NCHC SR 35 1 1 2 0.057
2018-19 Arizona State D1 NCHC JR 33 2 6 8 0.242
2017-18 Arizona State D1 NCHC SO 21 1 3 4 0.191
2016-17 Arizona State D1 NCHC FR 24 2 5 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2016-17 · Arizona State
+32.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22758
Forward overall
#855
Forward born in 1995
#565
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2000-01
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.