← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Young Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-12-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1118 0.1288 0.3084 0.3554
2014-15 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 52 14 13 27 0.519 0.1741 0.1914 0.4805 0.5282
2015-16 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 56 26 34 60 1.071 0.3593 0.3783 0.9915 1.0438
2016-17 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 56 26 43 69 1.232 0.4132 0.4149 1.1402 1.1449
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 American International D1 AHA GR 36 12 19 31 0.861
2020-21 American International D1 AHA SR 6 2 2 4 0.667
2019-20 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA JR 36 9 12 21 0.583
2018-19 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA SO 33 2 3 5 0.151
2017-18 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA FR 32 2 5 7 0.219
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2017-18 · Alaska Fairbanks
-36.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13055
Forward overall
#584
Forward born in 1997
#194
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Boston University (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Boston University (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2021-22
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2021-22
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.