IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

T.J. Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-02-17 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Calgary · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 58 6 14 20 0.345 0.1156 0.1280 0.3191 0.3532
2015-16 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 55 9 21 30 0.545 0.1830 0.1941 0.5048 0.5353
2016-17 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 58 5 26 31 0.534 0.1793 0.1814 0.4946 0.5004
2018-19 Univ. of Calgary USports-M 17 0 2 2 0.118 0.0620 0.0688 0.3447 0.3827
2019-20 Univ. of Calgary USports-M 28 1 8 9 0.321 0.1696 0.1696 0.9420 0.9420
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11779
Defenseman overall
#1994
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Klein
Wisconsin-Superior · 2009-10
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Kent
Hamilton · 2021-22
0.793 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Whited
Wisconsin-Stout · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.