IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jakub Kopecký Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-08 Country: Slovakia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 34 1 3 4 0.118 0.0723 0.0715 0.3465 0.3426
2023-24 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 47 3 8 11 0.234 0.0927 0.0913 0.2457 0.2419
2024-25 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 46 17 10 27 0.587 0.2326 0.2168 0.6163 0.5745
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC — 19 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36321
Forward overall
#2242
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cody Ganchar
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2011-12
0.862 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Sherer
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Burke
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.