IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Ranallo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-11-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Rogers USHS-MN 20 21 26 47 2.350 0.2975 0.2975 0.5708 0.5708
2021-22 Rogers USHS-MN 27 28 34 62 2.296 0.2907 0.2907 0.5578 0.5578
2022-23 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 10 0 2 2 0.200 0.1180 0.1212 0.6007 0.6172
2023-24 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 61 9 15 24 0.393 0.2321 0.2270 1.1815 1.1553
2024-25 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 26 2 6 8 0.308 0.1815 0.1682 0.9241 0.8565
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Thomas D1 CCHA FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31054
Forward overall
#1841
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Valeri Kneib
Beloit · 2022-23
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Carr
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Warfield
Daniel Webster · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.