← New Search ↗ Social Card

Landan Resendes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-12-10 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 25 13 10 23 0.920 0.1855 0.1855 0.4211 0.4211
2022-23 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 32 27 27 54 1.688 0.3402 0.3402 0.7492 0.8096
2023-24 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 59 14 16 30 0.508 0.3238 0.3338 1.5238 1.5710
2024-25 USHL 61 16 19 35 0.574 0.3654 0.3581 1.7195 1.6850
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston College D1 HockeyEast 34 3 3 6 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2025-26 · Boston College
-40.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7636
Forward overall
#384
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's · 2017-18
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.