← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Cronin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 St. Thomas Academy USHS-MN 21 10 18 28 1.333 0.1688 0.1688 0.3239 0.3239
2021-22 St. Thomas Academy USHS-MN 27 16 16 32 1.185 0.1500 0.1500 0.2879 0.2879
2022-23 Madison Capitols USHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0843 0.0858 0.4292 0.4370
2023-24 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 9 1 1 2 0.222 0.1311 0.1270 0.6674 0.6464
2024-25 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 8 0 2 2 0.250 0.1475 0.1353 0.7509 0.6890
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA FR 18 4 12 16 0.889
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.89
2025-26 · Alaska Fairbanks
+686.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8981
Forward overall
#339
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2024-25
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2006-07
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.