← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Biro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-08-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 50 8 24 32 0.640 0.2147 0.2317 0.5921 0.6390
2018-19 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 55 11 22 33 0.600 0.2012 0.2074 0.5551 0.5722
2019-20 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 50 15 29 44 0.880 0.2952 0.2952 0.8142 0.8142
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 American International D1 AHA — 36 3 9 12 0.333
2023-24 American International D1 AHA — 39 7 15 22 0.564
2022-23 American International D1 AHA — 38 11 20 31 0.816
2021-22 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 35 6 7 13 0.371
2020-21 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 18 0 2 2 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2020-21 · Colorado College
-40.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22584
Forward overall
#1059
Forward born in 2000
#553
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2016-17
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Assumption · 2016-17
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.269 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.