← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grayden Daul Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-01-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Janesville Jets NAHL 34 1 10 11 0.324 0.1282 0.1282 0.3396 0.3396
2021-22 Janesville Jets NAHL 56 11 28 39 0.696 0.2759 0.2843 0.7312 0.7535
2022-23 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 16 0 1 1 0.062 0.0384 0.0360 0.1841 0.1726
2023-24 Langley Rivermen BCHL 52 1 6 7 0.135 0.0501 0.0458 0.1961 0.1793
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA SO 8 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA 28 0 1 1 0.036
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2024-25 · Northern Michigan
-9.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25676
Defenseman overall
#3982
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2008-09
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2013-14
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.