← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Calgary Canucks AJHL 25 1 3 4 0.160 0.0537 0.0514 0.1481 0.1418
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Norwich D3 LittleEast GR 27 2 8 10 0.370
2021-22 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 17 7 9 16 0.941
2020-21 Norwich D1 LittleEast JR 8 1 3 4 0.500
2020-21 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 8 1 3 4 0.500
2019-20 Norwich D1 LittleEast SO 21 3 8 11 0.524
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 21 3 8 11 0.524
2018-19 Norwich D1 LittleEast FR 29 3 7 10 0.345
2018-19 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 29 3 7 10 0.345
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2018-19 · Norwich
+683.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#48258
Forward overall
#2635
Forward born in 1998
#1998
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2012-13
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.