IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Presley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-03-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Brunswick NE-Prep 30 1 3 4 0.133 0.0257 0.0257 0.0610 0.0610
2021-22 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 28 6 4 10 0.357 0.0403 0.0392 0.1215 0.1183
2022-23 — EHL 37 1 6 7 0.189 0.0277 0.0264 0.0928 0.0885
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC JR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 16 2 0 2 0.125
2023-24 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 9 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21012
Defenseman overall
#3378
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jacob Thousand
Colby · 2018-19
0.176 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Pfister
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike McCurtain
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.