IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-09-29 Country: Canada
Williams
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 29 1 2 3 0.103 0.0347 0.0360 0.0957 0.0991
2018-19 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 28 3 6 9 0.321 0.0823 0.0829 0.2423 0.2441
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#56878
Forward overall
#3469
Forward born in 1999
#2642
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Williams Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jack Simon
0.00
actual FR PPG at Williams
Owen Stadheim
0.00
actual FR PPG at Williams
Connor Berg
0.42
actual FR PPG at Williams
Chas Sabre
0.00
actual FR PPG at Williams

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Revniaga
Worcester State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Johnson
Nichols · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Robb Haider
Wisconsin-Stout · 2008-09
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.