IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joel Shoemaker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-01-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.1659 0.1744 0.4634 0.4871
2018-19 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 35 1 11 12 0.343 0.1138 0.1141 0.3178 0.3187
2019-20 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 42 4 6 10 0.238 0.0790 0.0790 0.2207 0.2207
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 22 0 14 14 0.636
2022-23 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 12 2 8 10 0.833
2021-22 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 16 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18139
Defenseman overall
#2765
Defenseman born in 2000
#2345
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Sam Piazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jacob Barber
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2010-11
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
A.J. Hau
Augsburg · 2004-05
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Russo
Elmira · 2017-18
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.