IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Hogan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-06-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1677 0.1882 0.4627 0.5192
2018-19 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 12 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 12 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 12 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 12 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 12 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 12 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Ryan Bliss
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Cornell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Fortunato
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston University (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Keegan Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Louie Belpedio
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Miami (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Nathan Billitier
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carter Shinkaruk
Elmira · 2008-09
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Kelly
St. Norbert · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jory McWilliams
Bethel · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.