IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Shinkaruk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-11-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Langley Rivermen BCHL 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.3853 0.4244 1.4544 1.6021
2009-10 Powell River Kings BCHL 55 5 7 12 0.218 0.0841 0.0881 0.3174 0.3323
2010-11 Powell River Kings BCHL 57 8 18 26 0.456 0.1757 0.1757 0.6634 0.6635
2011-12 — BCHL 60 11 10 21 0.350 0.1349 0.1275 0.5090 0.4811
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 24 19 7 26 1.083
2014-15 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 27 11 9 20 0.741
2013-14 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 25 10 9 19 0.760
2012-13 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 25 9 4 13 0.520
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2012-13 · Elmira
+275.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12963
Defenseman overall
#1413
Defenseman born in 1991
#2366
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Musselwhite
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stefan Seel
Concordia · 2014-15
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Parker Williams
Concordia · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.