IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lane Brockhoff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-04-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 52 5 15 20 0.385 0.1276 0.1294 0.3564 0.3615
2019-20 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 48 11 25 36 0.750 0.2488 0.2488 0.6951 0.6951
2020-21 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara D1 AHA — 34 3 10 13 0.382
2024-25 Niagara D1 AHA JR 15 0 1 1 0.067
2023-24 Niagara D1 AHA SO 37 2 6 8 0.216
2022-23 Niagara D1 AHA FR 30 0 4 4 0.133
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2022-23 · Niagara
+9.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6721
Defenseman overall
#1373
Defenseman born in 2000
#1060
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Wade
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tim Davison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Quinton Fox
Amherst · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Mulhearn
Hobart · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
John McElaney
Colby · 2019-20
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.