← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Mulhearn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-03-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Cornwall Colts CCHL 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.2129 0.2481 0.5161 0.6014
2016-17 Cornwall Colts CCHL 49 8 14 22 0.449 0.1434 0.1596 0.3476 0.3868
2017-18 Cornwall Colts CCHL 61 10 23 33 0.541 0.1727 0.1833 0.4188 0.4444
2018-19 Cornwall Colts CCHL 62 10 18 28 0.452 0.1442 0.1466 0.3496 0.3555
2019-20 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 62 21 29 50 0.806 0.2575 0.2575 0.6243 0.6243
2020-21 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 5 1 1 2 0.400
2023-24 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 7 2 1 3 0.429
2022-23 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 6 0 1 1 0.167
2021-22 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 10 1 7 8 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2021-22 · Hobart
+479.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27833
Forward overall
#1339
Forward born in 2000
#740
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2012-13
1.138 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2013-14
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2007-08
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.