← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Stout Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-04-20 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Wisconsin
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Minnetonka USHS-MN 27 4 6 10 0.370 0.0469 0.0469 0.0900 0.0900
2022-23 Minnetonka USHS-MN 31 7 19 26 0.839 0.1062 0.1062
2023-24 Madison Capitols USHL 15 2 1 3 0.200 0.1180 0.1238 0.6007 0.6301
2024-25 Madison Capitols USHL 58 4 14 18 0.310 0.1830 0.1826 0.9320 0.9300
2025-26 Madison Capitols USHL 57 9 12 21 0.368 0.2173 0.2063 1.1065 1.0507
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7361
Defenseman overall
#1555
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Wisconsin Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.45
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
NAHL 2023-24
0.27
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
USHL 2014-15
0.17
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.31
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2006-07
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2017-18
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.