← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Kondor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-05-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 3 1 2 3 1.000 0.3354 0.3759 0.9224 1.0338
2019-20 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 57 4 21 25 0.439 0.1471 0.1471 0.4046 0.4046
2020-21 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 7 2 4 6 0.857 0.2875 0.2875 0.7906 0.7906
2021-22 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 56 7 19 26 0.464 0.1557 0.1518 0.4283 0.4175
2022-23 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 11 0 5 5 0.455 0.1524 0.1410 0.4192 0.3879
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Aurora D3 NCHA GR 30 1 8 9 0.300
2024-25 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 28 1 5 6 0.214
2023-24 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 23 0 5 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2023-24 · Aurora
+58.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10683
Defenseman overall
#2233
Defenseman born in 2002
#1307
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2023-24
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2016-17
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.