← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Acheson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-04-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 14 0 2 2 0.143 0.0474 0.0529 0.1324 0.1478
2019-20 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 43 0 11 11 0.256 0.0849 0.0849 0.2371 0.2371
2020-21 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 21 2 17 19 0.905 0.3002 0.3002 0.8386 0.8386
2021-22 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 52 14 25 39 0.750 0.2488 0.2414 0.6951 0.6743
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SR 33 1 8 9 0.273
2024-25 Alaska Anchorage D1 27 1 5 6 0.222
2023-24 Bemidji State D1 CCHA 28 2 2 4 0.143
2022-23 Bemidji State D1 CCHA 15 0 1 1 0.067
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2022-23 · Bemidji State
-57.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5205
Defenseman overall
#1340
Defenseman born in 2002
#813
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.