IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Mueller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-26 Country: Canada
2023 NHL Draft Round 4, Pick #105  ·  Vancouver Canucks Vancouver Canucks
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — AJHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1677 0.1942 0.4634 0.5367
2019-20 — AJHL 50 6 24 30 0.600 0.2012 0.2012 0.5561 0.5561
2020-21 — AJHL 15 8 3 11 0.733 0.2459 0.2459 0.6796 0.6796
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC JR 40 11 15 26 0.650
2022-23 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 34 12 13 25 0.735
2021-22 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 24 8 5 13 0.542
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2021-22 · Nebraska Omaha
+225.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Dylan Gambrell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (1.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Anders Bjork
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Larkin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Michigan (1.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Stevens
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Chris Wilkie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ethan Mulhearn
Hobart · 2015-16
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Favaro
Curry · 2013-14
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Cannizzaro
Hobart · 2003-04
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.