IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Heath Armstrong Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Canmore Eagles AJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Brooks Bandits AJHL 8 0 2 2 0.250 0.0838 0.0838 0.2306 0.2306
2020-21 Brooks Bandits AJHL 14 4 2 6 0.429 0.1438 0.1438 0.3953 0.3953
2021-22 Brooks Bandits AJHL 27 2 12 14 0.518 0.1739 0.1691 0.4783 0.4652
2022-23 Brooks Bandits AJHL 51 13 43 56 1.098 0.3683 0.3400 1.0128 0.9348
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA JR 10 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21021
Forward overall
#1131
Forward born in 2002
#507
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ross Enmark
Curry · 2005-06
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Ecklund
Wisconsin-Superior · 2013-14
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Valenti
Utica · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.