← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Pappas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-11-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Toronto Patriots OJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Toronto Patriots OJHL 53 17 30 47 0.887 0.2174 0.2265 0.6070 0.6324
2019-20 Brooks Bandits AJHL 58 22 36 58 1.000 0.3354 0.3354 0.9268 0.9268
2020-21 Brooks Bandits AJHL 18 10 17 27 1.500 0.5031 0.5031 1.3902 1.3902
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA 21 4 13 17 0.809
2023-24 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA 34 11 20 31 0.912
2022-23 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA 23 3 3 6 0.261
2021-22 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC 26 2 8 10 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2021-22 · St. Lawrence
+98.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9159
Forward overall
#373
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2017-18
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.