← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riley See Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0668 0.0668 0.1857 0.1857
2020-21 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 12 0 2 2 0.167 0.0557 0.0557 0.1547 0.1547
2021-22 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 52 2 4 6 0.115 0.0385 0.0403 0.1071 0.1121
2022-23 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 23 4 4 8 0.348 0.1005 0.1017 0.2618 0.2648
2023-24 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 57 23 21 44 0.772 0.2184 0.2082 0.4864 0.4637
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 16 0 5 5 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2024-25 · Fredonia
+120.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29469
Forward overall
#1350
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2024-25
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.