← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Flint Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 6 1 3 4 0.667 0.2236 0.2236 0.6179 0.6179
2021-22 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 60 8 10 18 0.300 0.1006 0.0971 0.2780 0.2684
2022-23 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 55 12 14 26 0.473 0.1585 0.1452 0.4381 0.4013
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Marian D3 NCHA GR 26 10 11 21 0.808
2024-25 Marian D3 NCHA SR 27 4 7 11 0.407
2023-24 Marian D3 NCHA JR 20 1 2 3 0.150
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2023-24 · Marian
+39.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39790
Forward overall
#2487
Forward born in 2002
#1516
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2009-10
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.